advertise
« Paper: Consensus Protocols: Paxos | Main | Product: Lightcloud - Key-Value Database »
Friday
Mar062009

Cloud Programming Directly Feeds Cost Allocation Back into Software Design

Update 6: CARS = Cost Aware Runtimes and Services by William Louth.
Update 5: Damn You Google, Damn You Yahoo! Why D'Ya Do This to Us? Free accounts on a cloud platform are a constant drain of money.
Update 4: Caching becomes even more important in CPU based billing environments. Avoiding the CPU means saving money.
Update 3: An interesting simple example of this idea showed up on the Google AppEngine list. With one paging algorithm and one use of AJAX the yearly cost of the site was $1000. By changing those algorithms the site went under quota and became free again. This will make life a lot more interesting for developers.
Update 2: Business Model Influencing Software Architecture by Brandon Watson. The profitability of your project could disappear overnight on account of code behaving badly.
Update: Amazon adds Elastic Block Store at $0.10 per 1 million I/O requests. Now I need some cost minimization storage algorithms!

In the GAE Meetup yesterday a very interesting design rule came up: Design By Explicit Cost Model. A clumsy name I know, but it is explained like this:

 

If you are going to be charged for an operation GAE wants you to explicitly ask for it. This is why some automatic navigation between objects isn't provided because that will force an explicit query to be written. Writing an explicit query is a sort of EULA for being charged. Click OK in the form of a query and you've indicated that you are prepared to pay for a database operation.

Usually in programming the costs we talk about are time, space, latency, bandwidth, storage, person hours, etc. Listening to the Google folks talk about how one of their explicit design goals was to require programmers to be mindful of operations that will cost money made me realize in cloud programming cost will be another aspect of design we'll have to factor in.

Instead of asking for the Big O complexity of an algorithm we'll also have to ask for the Big $ (or Big Euro) notation so we can judge an algorithm by its cost against a particular cloud profile. Maybe something like $(CPU=1.3,DISK=3,IN-BANDWIDTH=2,OUT=BANDWIDTH=3, DB=10). You could look at the Big $ notation for algorithm and shake your head saying that approach will never work for GAE, but it could work for Amazon. Can we find a cheaper Big $? 

Typically infrastructure costs are part of the capital budget. Someone ponies up for the hardware and software is then "free" until more infrastructure is needed. The dollar cost of software design isn't usually an explicit factor considered.

Now software design decisions are part of the operations budget. Every algorithm decision you make will have dollar cost associated with it and it may become more important to craft algorithms that minimize operations cost across a large number of resources (CPU, disk, bandwidth, etc) than it is to trade off our old friends space and time.

Different cloud architecture will force very different design decisions. Under Amazon CPU is cheap whereas under GAE CPU is a scarce commodity. Applications between the two niches will not be easily ported.

Don't be surprised if soon you go into an interview and they quiz you on Big $ notation and skip the dusty old relic that is Big O notation :-)

Reader Comments (6)

My experience is that the dollar or euro cost of a back end database operation isn't high on the list of things that developers think about. It simply isn't on there radar. I should be though.

I recently devised a simple methodology for calculating the cost of a query or database operation & using that cost as feedback into our own development group. It's a seat of the pants number, but it is useful in determining whether or not optimization of existing code should be prioritized over implementation of new functionality.

I hate shameless self-promotion, but......interested parties could check out the scalability tag on my blog.

--Mike

November 29, 1990 | Unregistered CommenterMichael Janke

> I hate shameless self-promotion

You need to be a little more shameless and include a direct link next time :-) Links to useful stuff is always encouraged. I think this is the one you meant: http://lastinfirstout.blogspot.com/2008/05/quarter-million-dollar-query.html

November 29, 1990 | Unregistered CommenterTodd Hoff

Thanks Todd - I'm never quite sure about blog etiquette.

In any case, the key concept is to "craft algorithms that minimize operations cost across a large number of resources". And to do that, the persons crafting the algorithms need to understand the cost of the resources.

In the case of internally developed applications, that feedback loop can & should be part of the normal development process. In our case, app server CPU's are cheap and easy to scale, database server CPU's are expensive and hard to scale, so any change to an application that shifts CPU resources from the database server to the app servers is likely going to be a good thing (in our case).

With purchased applications it gets more interesting. The vendor likely has no interest or financial incentive to make their application consume less hardware. Why would they? Maybe we need to structure software licensing agreements to somehow give a software vendor incentive to optimize their application.

--Mike

November 29, 1990 | Unregistered CommenterMichael Janke

an easy way to go for is to start it with a flow chart then go on with the algorithms and till finally you reach the execution.
-----
http://underwaterseaplants.awardspace.com">sea plants
http://underwaterseaplants.awardspace.com/seagrapes.htm">sea grapes...http://underwaterseaplants.awardspace.com/seaweed.htm">seaweed

November 29, 1990 | Unregistered Commenterfarhaj

This is especially interesting when the $ is directly related to the resource usage, e.g. speed. So by forcing programmers to figure cheap $(CPU=1.3,DISK=3,IN-BANDWIDTH=2,OUT=BANDWIDTH=3, DB=10) methods you could be speeding up your site at the same time.

But if $ and speed are not related, this could be more difficult to decide. Should I build fast and expensive or cheap and slow?

November 29, 1990 | Unregistered CommenterJan

Some weeks ago, I wrote a short note about a new attack vector in the cloud, a DDoP, the "Distributed Denial of Payment" attack.

http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/8-DDoP-new-Attacks-in-the-Cloud.html">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/8-DDoP-new-Attacks-in-the-Cloud.html

November 29, 1990 | Unregistered CommenterIngo Schramm

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>