Google Pro Tip: Use Back-of-the-envelope-calculations to Choose the Best Design
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 at 8:44AM
Todd Hoff in Strategy, google

How do you know which is the "best" design for a given problem? If, for example, you were given the problem of generating an image search results page of 30 thumbnails, would you load images sequentially? In parallel? Would you cache? How would you decide?

If you could harness the power of the multiverse you could try every possible option in the design space and see which worked best. But that's crazy impractical, isn't it?

Another option is to consider the order of various algorithm alternatives. As a prophet for the Golden Age of Computational Thinking, Google would definitely do this, but what else might Google do?

Use Back-of-the-envelope Calculations to Evaluate Different Designs

Jeff Dean, Head of Google's School of Infrastructure Wizardry—instrumental in many of Google's key systems: ad serving, BigTable; search, MapReduce, ProtocolBuffers—advocates evaluating different designs using back-of-the-envelope calculations. He gives the full story in this Stanford video presentation.

Back-of-the-envelope calculations are estimates you create using a combination of thought experiments and common performance numbers to a get a good feel for which designs will meet your requirements. Dr. Dean thinks an important skill for every software engineer is the ability to estimate the performance of alternative systems, using back of the envelope calculations, without having to build them. 

He gives a great example of the process in the video, but first...

Numbers Everyone Should Know

To evaluate design alternatives you first need a good sense of how long typical operations will take. Dr. Dean gives this list:

Some things to notice:

Example: Generate Image Results Page of 30 Thumbnails

The is the example given in the video. Two design alternatives are used as design thought experiments.

Design 1 - Serial 

Design 2 - Parallel 

  • Issue reads in parallel.
  • Performance: 10 ms/seek + 256K read / 30 MB/s = 18ms
  • There will be variance from the disk reads, so the more likely time is 30-60ms

Which design is best? It depends on you requirements, but given the back-of-the-envelope calculations you have a quick way to compare them without building them.

Now you have a framework for asking yourself other design questions and comparing different design variations:

To make these estimates realistic you'll have to know the performance of your services. If there is an unknown variable then perhaps you could rapidly prototype just that part to settle the question.  To know if caching is a good design alternative, for example, you'll have to know how long it takes to write into your cache.

Lessons Learned

I personally quite like this approach. It seems much more grounded in the end-to-end nature of a system than is common. The practice today is to focus on the trickeration of various algorithms, which are really a researchable and pluggable part of this larger, more holistic analysis.

Related Articles

Article originally appeared on (
See website for complete article licensing information.