Part 2: The Cloud Does Equal High performance
Wednesday, August 20, 2014 at 8:57AM
Todd Hoff in AWS, Database

This a guest post by Anshu Prateek, Tech Lead, DevOps at Aerospike and Rajkumar Iyer, Member of the Technical Staff at Aerospike.

In our first post we busted the myth that cloud != high performance and outlined the steps to 1 Million TPS (100% reads in RAM) on 1 Amazon EC2 instance for just $1.68/hr. In this post we evaluate the performance of 4 Amazon instances when running a 4 node Aerospike cluster in RAM with 5 different read/write workloads and show that the r3.2xlarge instance delivers the best price/performance.

Several reports have already documented the performance of distributed NoSQL databases on virtual and bare metal cloud infrastructures:

For this series of experiments we tested Amazon instances using a 4 node Aerospike cluster with data in memory (RAM), and 5 real world workloads - from 100% writes, 50/50 balanced reads/writes, 80/20 and 95/5 to 100% reads. In addition, instead of 1 node, 100% reads and 10 Million objects used in the first post, in this experiment, we used 40 Million objects and the 4 node Aerospike cluster with mixed reads and writes was doing more work than the single node, to ensure synchronous replication and immediate consistency.

We used the following 4 Amazon instances:

Result 1: Amazon r3.* scales Aerospike cluster TPS linearly with percentage of reads image(2).png

(Higher is better)

On a 4 node Aerospike cluster, the Amazon r3.* instance delivers the highest throughput across workloads and scales linearly with the percentage of reads. Other instance types bottleneck on the network and cannot push higher amounts of reads

Result 2: Amazon latencies vs TPS per instance


(Lower is better)

Each Amazon instance has a limited number of requests that can be processed with low latency. Once the limit is reached even though higher throughput can be achieved, latency characteristics deteriorate rapidly.

Result 3: Amazon r3.large scales Aerospike TPS linearly on just a handful of nodesimage(3).png

(Higher is better)

On Amazon r3.large and a 80/20 read/write workload, Aerospike TPS scales linearly from 27k TPS on two nodes to 140k TPS on just 8 nodes.

Result 4: Comparing Number of Nodes vs TPS across Amazon Instancesimage(6).png

(Lower is better)

Result 5: Amazon r3.2xlarge shows optimal price/performance with Aerospike


(Lower is better)

Depending on the instance, 2-67 nodes are required to deliver performance ranging from 15k TPS to 1 Million TPS, for prices starting at just $252 per month to $8552 per month. Costs can go down further with yearly reservation and this graph shows that the best Amazon instance for Aerospike is the r3.large or r3.2xlarge, with r3.2xlarge requiring slightly fewer nodes and lower costs for the same performance.

We have documented the steps so that you too can validate the performance of Amazon instances and reproduce results that show linear scalability, extremely high throughput and predictable low latency with Aerospike on Amazon.

Step by Step Setup

Run the Tests Yourself

We have published a cloud formation script - which should take care of spinning up server and client instances and setup up the Aerospike cluster. Follow instruction in the README to try it yourself. This should be quick and cost you 1 hour worth of instance time that is $5.60 ($2.8 each for servers and clients).

Related Articles

Article originally appeared on (
See website for complete article licensing information.